The Real Reason Uber Pisses Off Left Intellectuals

By Graham Peterson

Yet another criticism of Uber popped up on Slate today, leading with: “The world’s brashest startup spent 2014 expanding aggressively and infuriating just about everyone.”  Once again a small community of upper middle class leftist journalists has crowned itself “just about everyone.”  Uber might infuriate these people, but it makes everyone else’s day, if its explosive growth in employment and consumers is any evidence.

Uber is, technically speaking, not news.  Companies innovate technologically every day.  The logistics software, Cobra, that my father used in the 1980s to coordinate electrical contracting bids has undergone massive improvements.  Companies erode government privileges every day.  A carpenter buddy of mine hasn’t worked a day for a Union because he prefers working for himself.  So why do Uber, or Airbnb, or any of the companies in the sharing economy get so much press?

Because they touch directly the lives of bohemian, college educated, upper middle class lefties who need cheap cabs to get to their reclaimed salmon taco brunches and booty calls cheaply — to wit, the friends of left journalists and bloggers.  Uber has caused a stir because of the particular symbolic impact is has on a very particular community who enjoys particularly good access to public conversation — not because of its economic impact.  The success of Uber undermines a lot of wrong ideology about the economy, and that hurts a lot of intellectuals’ feelings.

The sharing economy isn’t any different than the economy economy, but it is an especial threat to intellectuals who see their friends becoming convinced, through their own lived experiences, that capitalist progress is pretty great.  Uber has unquestionably improved cab service and raised driver salaries.  It’s also probably made cabbing safer (have you ever called a traditional cab company trying to complain about your driver?).  Critics don’t have a leg to stand on when it comes to the traditional economics they’re hurt about, so they’ve reached for a smear campaign.

Uber is sexist.  Uber is racist.  Uber is classist.  And finally, “aha!  Uber is anti-left-cultural-critic!” after Uber had had enough and (wrongly) toyed with retaliation.  We might forgive people who take exception to being relentlessly smeared on the new left’s critical theory slash meet-me-at-the-swings-at-recess gossip rag, Buzzfeed.

The recent and explosive economic success of lowly nerds, cab driving stiffs, and apartment renters is the latest evidence that legacy money doesn’t buy power.  But some will apparently leave no crappy argument unturned to maintain the specter of Big Bad Business Owners.  The facts — that markets are ultimately about sharing, giving, creating, connecting, and helping — are what really bothers the left.  It’s too bad they find the facts so offensive.

 

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “The Real Reason Uber Pisses Off Left Intellectuals”

  1. The accusations of racism and classism thrown at Uber are so utterly absurd – it was in relatively recent memory that NYC had to actually legislate regulations in response to the widespread and pervasive problem of yellow cabs not picking people up in “certain neighborhoods” (or rolling up the window and speeding off when you told the cabbie you wanted to go to one of said neighborhoods).

    Like

    1. Yep. I used to live in a Puerto Rican neighborhood and would have to flag more than one cab to get home from the hipster neighborhood next door in Chicago.

      But the cab lobby says that poor minorities won’t be able to use Uber because they don’t have smart phones and credit cards. Bullshit.

      Smart phones are one of the few things poor people actually do own (witness the success of cell phones in African regions with no roads). And every currency exchange in the city sells debit cards that you can add cash to.

      Anyway, since when does inducing competition to drive down cab fares (while increasing the wages of drivers, no less), make cabs *less* accessible to the poor?

      The criticism of Uber is an embarrassing litany of broken economics and character invective, and it’s a real comment on the state of left cultural and economic criticism that it continues to fly.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s